Back in my days as a business reporter I once had the opportunity to interview Benjamin Zander, the conductor of the Boston Philharmonic Orchestra. Why should a business paper interview a philharmonic conductor? I’d heard he had a successful business as a colorful speaker.
Zander is a different kind of speaker and he made a good story. By turns entertaining and intellectual, Zander is indeed fascinating (look him up on TED). During our interview, however, one of the things Zander mentioned has always stuck with me. He said that in his orchestra, he made a point of trying to get his musicians to respond to mistakes with as simple phrase … “how interesting.”
Just think about that for a moment. The response he wanted to promote wasn’t “oh damn” or “oops” or “just shoot me” … it was “how interesting.” And he wanted them to say it out loud too. It gives you the freedom to explore why things happen, or how. And that’s how you get to a positive result quicker.
Recently, I just concluded a large, two-year project for a large networking company. The working group I shepherded (as strategic project manager) was very successful. It was by no means easy, with many obstacles to overcome, but in the end we did indeed overcome them.
One of my main client contacts and I had an interesting relationship. Whenever I got an unexpected result that was negative, I usually responded with “how interesting” while, conversely, the client often only responded to an unexpected positive result with “how interesting.”
It made for a good combination. As a team we focused on the “why” of a result, good or bad.
It’s hard to argue with our results. Just remember that lesson, and try to say “how interesting” more often.